You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Association between plasma catecholamine concentration and mortality in hospitalized adults with COVID-19: a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial

The pathophysiology of COVID-19 sepsis is linked to activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) pathway, a heightened inflammatory cascade, and thrombosis. Catecholamines are likely central to all three [1]. COVID-19 sepsis is often characterized by hypoxemia, hypotension, and shock, which are treated with exogenous catecholamines. However, some data suggest detrimental effects of exogenous catecholamine use in sepsis [2]. We investigated the relationship between endogenous catecholamines and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and assessed the relationship between catecholamines and angiotensin II (Ang II), cytokines, and platelets to explore associated mechanisms.

We analyzed epinephrine and norepinephrine values (High Sensitive ELISA assay; Eagle Biosciences) in blood samples from patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with new hypoxemia who participated in one of two randomized trials (ACTIV-4 Host Tissue clinical trial platform: NCT04924660). [3] Exclusion criteria were COVID-19 symptoms > 14 days, hospitalization > 3 days, or vasopressor use at randomization. Therapeutic trials ran with a shared placebo arm and investigated RAAS agents, TXA-127 (synthetic angiotensin1-7) and TRV-027 (angiotensin II type 1 receptor-biased ligand). To mitigate the treatment’s confounding effects, we used baseline blood samples from the placebo and treatment arms before randomization (day 0) and serial samples (days 3 and 5 post-randomization) from the placebo arm only. We measured cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, KC/GRO, and TNFα with a validated multiplex assay [Meso Scale Diagnostics]), renalase (electrochemiluminescence assay platform [Meso Scale Diagnostics]), Ang II, and Ang-(1-7) (distinct radioimmunoassays, Hypertension Center, Wake Forest). We built Cox regression models for mortality and bivariate mixed-effect models to evaluate within-subject correlation of biomarkers over time using SAS version 9.4.

From October- November 2022, we analyzed data from 156 patients. Ninety-day mortality was 23% (median time: 15 days [IQR: 10–26]). Survivors and decedents had similar sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, baseline hemodynamics, and COVID-19 medications (p > 0.05). Decedents had higher age (61 years vs 51 years; p = 0.002), preexisting oxygen use (8% vs 1%, p = 0.044), vasopressor use (42% vs 7%; p < 0.001), and ICU admissions (67% vs 18%; p < 0.001) and worse WHO severity scores (> 4; 75% vs 23%; p < 0.001).

Median baseline values were 331.4 (range: 15.8–2397.2) pg/ml for endogenous norepinephrine and 30.3 (range: 0.0–871.20) pg/ml for endogenous epinephrine. Univariate analysis showed every 100 pg/ml increase in norepinephrine was associated with increased risk of death at baseline (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01–1.17; p = 0.028) and day 5 (HR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04–1.10; p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed endogenous norepinephrine values were independently associated with 90-day mortality after adjusting for demographics, COVID-19 severity, and exogenous norepinephrine administration. Every 100 pg/ml increase in plasma norepinephrine from baseline was associated with an 11% increased risk of death (HR = 1.11; 95% CI; 1.01–1.21, Fig. 1A), and mortality risk was 14 times higher for patients with increasing trends over 5 days than decreasing trends (HR = 14.11; 95% CI: 2.3–86.75, Fig. 1B). Sensitivity analysis showed all associations remained robust statistically (p < 0.02) after excluding patients who received exogenous norepinephrine.

Fig. 1
figure 1

(a) Multivariable Cox Regression Model of Norepinephrine and Mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and (b) Kaplan–Meier Survival Curves for Mortality Events and Norepinephrine (by Trend of Change) adjusted for covariates

Norepinephrine was significantly and positively correlated with RAAS and cytokines at baseline (Ang II, Ang1-7, IL-6, TNFα, IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-8; p < 0.01), day 3 (Ang II and TNFα; p < 0.02), and day 5 (Ang II, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10; p < 0.01). Longitudinally, at the patient level, norepinephrine was positively correlated with Ang II (r = 0.67, p < 0.01), IL-6 (r = 0.68, p < 0.01) and IL-8 (r = 0.60, p < 0.03). We did not find significant correlation between epinephrine and mortality or with other biomarkers over time (p > 0.05).

We note some limitations. We did not stabilize catecholamines at collection and post-hoc, our study lacked an external validation cohort. However, our results were strengthened by a methodologically rigorous data collection platform across 35 sites.

Our results support the hypothesis that COVID-19 is a high-endogenous catecholamine state. We report high plasma values of norepinephrine (3–10 times that of healthy historical controls) in patients admitted with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 [4], corroborating similar results in another cohort of ICU COVID-19 patients [5]. We found high endogenous norepinephrine to be independently associated with 90-day mortality. This association remained valid, even excluding patients with exogeneous vasopressor use. The bivariate serial sample correlation between endogenous norepinephrine and Ang II and IL-6 may explain how sustained elevations of endogenous norepinephrine contribute to mortality risk. Endogenous norepinephrine is implicated in the upregulation of inflammation and thrombotic systems, which causes microvascular dysfunction in severe COVID-19. Taken together, our findings support further studies investigating the role of catecholamines in COVID-19-related shock.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ACE-AngII-AT1R:

Angiotensin converting enzyme-angiotensin II-angiotensin II type 1 receptor

ACTIV:

Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines

Ang II:

Angiotensin II

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

AT2R:

Angiotensin II type 2 receptor

B1arrestin:

Beta arrestin

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

GEE:

Generalized Estimating Equations

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IL-:

Interleukin-

IQR:

Interquartile range

MAR:

Missing at random

MSD:

Mesoscale

NECTAR:

Novel Experimental COVID Therapies Affecting Host Response

QC:

Quality control

RAAS:

Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system

RAS:

Renin-angiotenisin system

RNLS:

Renalase, FAD Dependent Amine Oxidase

TNFα:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

TRV-027:

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor-biased ligand

TXA-127:

(Synthetic angiotensin 1–7)

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Gubbi S, Nazari MA, Taieb D, Klubo-Gwiezdzinska J, Pacak K. Catecholamine physiology and its implications in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(12):978–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mermiri M, Mavrovounis G, Laou E, Papagiannakis N, Pantazopoulos I, Chalkias A. Association of vasopressors with mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiol Perioperative Sci. 2023;1(2):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Self WH, Shotwell MS, Gibbs KW, et al. Renin-angiotensin system modulation with synthetic angiotensin (1–7) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor-biased ligand in adults with COVID-19: two randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2023;329(14):1170–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pluto R, Burger P. Normal values of catecholamines in blood plasma determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection. Int J Sports Med. 1988;9(Suppl 2):S75-78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dammassa V, Voltini M, Colombo CNJ, et al. Endogenous catecholamine release in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome: link between enhanced sympathetic stimulation, cardiac dysfunction and outcome. J Clin Med. 2023;12(4):1557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Noah Brazer and Sharese Terrell Willis assisted with copyediting and submission.

Collaborating Authors: David, Hager1; Matthew, W, Semler2,3; Michael, A, Puskarich4; Lisa, H, Merck5; Lokesh, K, Venkateshaiah6; Jeffrey, M, Sturek7; Brian, R, Tiffany8; Michelle, S, Harkins9; Akram, Khan10; Kevin, W, Gibbs11; Ali, Javaheri12; Nicole, M, Iovine13; Peter, Chen14; Adit, A, Ginde15; Derek, J, Vonderhaar16; Meghan, Morrison Joly17; Aaron, Barksdale18; Mark, Chappell19

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Center for Learning Healthcare, Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, Tennessee. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond. Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio. Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. CommonSpirit Health, Phoenix, Arizona. Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Department of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Disease, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville. Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Department of Medicine, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana. Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. Hypertension and Vascular Research Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Funding

TSA Grant Number UL1 TR001863 from the NCATS. NIH Agreement 1OT2HL156812 through the NHLBI CONNECTS program. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

BS, GD, BZ, YD, XG, DCF, MC, WS, and SPC contributed to the conceptualization, analysis plan, data acquisition, and manuscript drafting and revising. BS additionally contributed to grant writing and funding acquisition, while GD and BZ contributed to marker analysis, and data analysis. MCC contributed to conceptualization analysis plan, data acquisition, and manuscript drafting. MCC's lab performed the AngII analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basmah Safdar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Vanderbilt University IRB.

Consent for publication

This study does not include individual persons’ data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safdar, B., Desir, G., Zhou, B. et al. Association between plasma catecholamine concentration and mortality in hospitalized adults with COVID-19: a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial. Crit Care 29, 183 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13054-025-05334-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13054-025-05334-6

Keywords